Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Study of the distribution of Malassezia species in patients with pityriasis versicolor and healthy individuals in Tehran, Iran

  • Bita Tarazooie1,
  • Parivash Kordbacheh1,
  • Farideh Zaini1,
  • Kamiar Zomorodian1Email author,
  • Farshid Saadat2,
  • Hojjat Zeraati3,
  • Zahra Hallaji4 and
  • Sassan Rezaie1
BMC Dermatology20044:5

DOI: 10.1186/1471-5945-4-5

Received: 17 December 2003

Accepted: 01 May 2004

Published: 01 May 2004

Abstract

Background

Pityriasis versicolor is a superficial infection of the stratum corneum which caused by a group of yeasts formerly named pityrosporium. The taxonomy of these lipophilic yeasts has recently been modified and includes seven species referred as Malassezia. The aim of this study is to compare the distribution of Malassezia species isolated from pityriasis versicolor lesions and those isolated from healthy skins.

Methods

Differentiation of all malassezia species performed using morphological features and physiological test including catalase reaction, Tween assimilation test and splitting of esculin.

Results

In pityriasis versicolor lesions, the most frequently isolated species was M. globosa (53.3%), followed by M. furfur (25.3%), M. sympodialis(9.3%), M. obtusa (8.1%) and M. slooffiae (4.0%). The most frequently isolated species in the skin of healthy individuals were M. globosa, M. sympodialis, M. furfur, M. sloofiae and M. restricta which respectively made up 41.7%, 25.0%, 23.3%, 6.7% and 3.3% of the isolated species.

Conclusions

According to our data, M. globosa was the most prevalent species in the skin of healthy individuals which recovered only in the yeast form. However, the Mycelial form of M. globosa was isolated as the dominant species from pityriasis versicolor lesions. Therefore, the role of predisposing factors in the conversion of this yeast to mycelium and its subsequent involvement in pityriasis versicolor pathogenicity should be considered.

Keywords

pityriasis versicolor Malassezia species healthy skin

Background

Yeasts of the genus Malassezia are known to be members of the skin microflora of human and other warm-blooded vertebrates [1, 2]. These lipophilic yeasts are associated with various human diseases, especially pityriasis versicolor (PV), a chronic superficial scaling dermatomycosis [3]. This disease is common in late teens and young adults of both sex and characterized by well-demarcated scaling patches with variable pigmentation [4].

Although PV had been described at the beginning of nineteen century [5], until recently classification of its etiologic agent was a matter of debt. This controversy may be caused by various morphological features and fastidious growth requirements of Malassezia yeasts in vitro.

The genus of Malassezia has undergone several taxonomic revisions [1, 6]. In the last reclassification by Gueho et al, seven distinct species were recognized within this genus, namely M. furfur, M. pachydermatis, M. sympodialis, M. globosa, M. obtusa, M. restricta and M. slooffiae [7]. Furthermore, recently three new species were included in this genus namely, M. dermatis, M. equi and M. nana [8, 9]. However, the acceptance of these new species is still under investigation. There is only scanty information about the epidemiology and ecology of Malassezia species available and the clinical significance of these species is not completely recognized. Therefore, the aim of this study is to establish whether there is any association between the various species of Malassezia and PV lesions as well as determining Malassezia species microflora of healthy individuals.

Methods

Subjects

Ninety four outpatients at Razi hospital and medical mycology unit in the school of public health were included in this study. 100 age- and sex-matched clinically healthy individuals (without any dermatosis) were also conducted as control. A questionnaire was used to getting informative data about history of each person.

Collection and culture of samples

Mycological examinations were performed to confirm the diagnosis of pityriasis versicolor. Specimens were taken by scraping the lesions with a scalpel. Moreover, in normal subjects and in cases which there were not sufficient scales, samples were taken by means of sellotape.

Direct microscopy with KOH 20% and methylene blue staining were carried out in the PV lesions as well as normal samples. All samples were also inoculated in plates containing modified Dixon medium. The plates were incubated at 31°C for two weeks and examined at frequent intervals for developing colonies.

Identification

Malassezia species were identified according to their morphological features and physiological properties. Isolated colonies on modified Dixon agar were used for identification. Among Malassezia species, only M. pachydermatitis is able to grow on Sabouraud agar [7]. However, further tests are essential for identification of other Malassezia species such as Tween assimilation test, catalase reaction and splitting of esculin [10, 11].

Tween assimilation test

According to the method reported by Guillot et al [10], ability to utilize different Tween compounds as a unique lipid supplement by Malassezia species was evaluated. Briefly, yeast suspension (at least 107 cfu/ml) was made in 2 ml sterilized distilled water and poured into plate containing Sabouraud dextrose agar at 45°C. The inoculum was then spread evenly. After solidification of each plate, four wells were made and filled with 30 μl of a Tween compound, i.e. Tween 20, 40, 60 and 80, respectively. These plates were incubated for a week at 31°C and the growth was assessed around the individual wells after 2, 4 and 7 days.

Catalase reaction

Presence of catalse was determined by using a drop of hydrogen peroxide (3% solution) and production of gas bubbles was considered as a positive reaction. Lack of catalase activity is a characteristic feature of M. restricta [10].

Splitting of esculin

The β-glucosidase activity of different Malassezia species was assayed using method described by Mayser et al [11]. Briefly, a loop of fresh yeast was inoculated deeply in the esculin agar tube and incubated for 5 days at 32°C. The splitting of esculin is revealed by darkening of the medium. This test was used to distinguish M. furfur, M. slooffiae and M. sympodialis from other Malassezia species.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were analyzed by the group t-test. The data of the patient and healthy controls were analyzed using chi-square test. Correlation of predisposing factors with PV as well as the difference between isolates from patients and normal individuals was evaluated by Fisher exact test. Specificity and sensitivity of direct exam versus culture were computed. Besides, the effects of predisposing factors on culture results in both groups were eliminated by Mantel-Haenszel tests. A P-values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

From 94 patients with PV, 52.1% of the cases were female. The average and median ages of patients were 29.19 ± 11.14 and 27 years, respectively. The highest prevalence of tinea versicolor was seen in patients with 20–30 years of age. Significant differences in the distribution of predisposing factors (i.e. allergy, hyperhydrosis, diabetes) were observed between patient groups (58.5%) and healthy control (30 %)(P < 0.001).

Direct examination of specimens was positive in 98.9% of PV lesions, in which hyphae were seen in 89.4% of positive cases together with budding yeasts. However, only 79.8% of the specimens yielded Malassezia in culture. Besides, culture positive cases were higher in patients than healthy controls and these differences was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Specificity and sensitivity of direct exam in comparison with culture were determined 62.8% and 99.4%, respectively.

Actual data related on predisposing factors and culture results were presented in tables 1, 2 and 3. Statistical analysis revealed that in both groups with and without predisposing factors (allergy, hyperhydrosis and diabetes), the rate of positive culture cases was higher in patients than controls. Regarding elimination the effects of predisposing factors by Mantel-Haenszel test, only hyperhydrosis could cause difference in the culture of samples in patients compared with those in healthy individuals.
Table 1

Frequency of culture results and hyperhydrosis in patients with pityriasis versicolor compared with normal subjects.

Group

Patient

Normal

 

Culture results

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

Negative

Total

statistical result

Hyperhydrosis

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

 

Positive

37

74.0

13

26.0

50

100.0

9

60.0

6

40.0

15

100.0

f.p = 0.23

Negative

67

72.8

25

27.2

92

100.0

51

60.0

34

40.0

85

100.0

X2 = 3.27 P = 0.07

Total

104

73.2

38

26.8

142

100.0

60

60.0

40

40.0

100

100.0

X2 MH = 3.74 P = 0.053

f.p: fisher exact test p-value; X2: Chi square; P: P value; X2 MH: Mantel-Haenszel Chi square No: Number; %: Percent.

Table 2

Frequency of culture results and allergy in patients with pityriasis versicolor compared with normal subjects.

Group

Patient

Normal

 

Culture results

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

Negative

Total

statistical result

Allergy

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

 

Positive

19

63.3

11

36.7

30

100.0

6

45.5

5

45.5

11

100.0

f.p = 0.44

Negative

85

75.9

27

24.1

112

100.0

54

60.7

35

39.3

89

100.0

X2 = 5.38 P = 0.02

Total

104

73.2

38

26.8

142

100.0

60

60.0

40

40.0

100

100.0

X2 MH = 4.77 P = 0.03

f.p: fisher exact test p-value; X2: Chi square; P: P value; X2 MH: Mantel-Haenszel Chi square No: Number; %: Percent.

Table 3

Frequency of culture results and diabetes in patients with pityriasis versicolor compared with normal subjects.

Group

Patient

Normal

 

Culture results

Positive

Negative

Total

Positive

Negative

Total

statistical result

Diabetes

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

No

%

 

Positive

2

66.7

1

33.3

3

100.0

2

50.0

2

50.0

4

100.0

f.p = 0.6

Negative

102

73.4

37

26.6

139

100.0

58

60.4

38

39.6

96

100.0

X2 = 4.39 P = 0.04

Total

104

73.2

38

26.8

142

100.0

60

60.0

40

40.0

100

100.0

X2 MH = 3.97 P = 0.046

f.p: fisher exact test p-value; X2: Chi square; P: P value; X2 MH: Mantel-Haenszel Chi square No: Number; %: Percent.

In pityriasis versicolor lesions, the most commonly isolated species was M. globosa (53.3%), followed in frequency by M. furfur (25.3%), M. sympodialis(9.3%), M. obtusa (8.1%) and M. slooffiae(4.0%). However, the most frequently detected species in healthy individuals were M. globosa, M. sympodialis, M. furfur, M. slooffiae and M. restricta which respectively made up 41.7%, 25.0%, 23.3%, 6.7% and 3.3% of the isolated Malassezia flora. Table 4 and 5, show the distribution of Malas sezia species, based on the sites of sample collection. Overall, no differences in distribution of Malassezia were noted between patients group and healthy controls (P = 0.1).
Table 4

Distribution of Malassezia species based on the body sites in Pityriasis Versicolor

 

Anatomic site (%)

Species

Neck

Chest

Abdomen

Back

Limbs

Groin

Total

M. globosa

13 (61.9)

7 (41.2)

2 (25.0)

14 (63.6)

2 (66.7)

2 (50.0)

40 (53.3)

M. furfur

3 (14.3)

7 (41.2)

2 (25.0)

6 (27.4)

1 (33.3)

0 (0.0)

19 (25.3)

M. sympodialis

1 (4.8)

1 (5.9)

2 (25.0)

1 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

2 (50.0)

7 (9.3)

M. obtusa

4 (19.0)

1 (5.9)

1 (12.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

6 (8.1)

M. slooffiae

0 (0.0)

1 (5.8)

1 (12.5)

1 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (4.0)

Total

21 (100.0)

17 (100.0)

8 (100.0)

22 (100.0)

3 (100.0)

4 (100.0)

75 (100.0)

Table 5

Distribution of Malassezia species based on the body sites in healthy individuals

 

Anatomic site (%)

Species

Scalp

Chest

Back

Total

M. globosa

8 (28.6)

6 (42.9)

11 (61.1)

25 (41.7)

M. furfur

9 (32.1)

3 (21.4)

2 (11.1)

14 (23.3)

M. sympodialis

8 (28.6)

3 (21.4)

4 (22.2)

15 (25.0)

M. slooffiae

1 (3.6)

2 (14.3)

1 (5.6)

4 (6.7)

M. restricta

2 (7.1)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (3.3)

Total

28(100.0)

14 (100.0)

18 (100.0)

60(100.0)

Discussion

Although pityriasis versicolor has worldwide occurrence, its frequency is variable and depends on different climatic, occupational and socio-economic conditions [12, 13]. This disease is prevalent in Iran, in which almost 6% of all dermatosis and approximately 30% of dermatomycoses are due to these lipophilic yeasts [14, 15].

Similar to other investigations [1, 3, 16, 17], the highest prevalence of PV in present study was observed in 20–30 year-old group, suggesting that the peak of the infection is coincided with ages when the sebum production is in the highest level. Although 60% of patients in age range of 10–20 years were female, this proportion was reversed in the age group 20–30. Lower maturity age in female compared with male can be considered as the possible reason of this dissimilarity.

Pityriasis versicolor is uncommon in children [3]. We just found one case of PV in a child with the age less than 10 years. Moreover it is only rarely found in the elderly [1], as we have only two cases of PV over 50s.

The role of sex in propensity to development of PV is still unclear. Some studies found that PV is more common in men than women [18, 19]. While others indicated that the incidence of this infection is higher in women [2022], which may be due to extra attention of women to beauty and skin hygiene. However, similar to many reports [3, 4, 17], we found no differences in development of PV among both sexes.

Although Malassezia species are considered as normal microflora of the human skin, these lipophilic yeasts are associated with many skin disorders in particular PV, in some circumstances [1, 23]. It is widely believed that endogenous factors such as administration of corticosteroids, malnutrition and increased plasma cortisol level mediating the development of PV [3, 12, 16, 24]. Besides, role of high temperature and humidity in this condition is well established [1, 25]. In this regard, no significant differences were observed in culture results of patients in comparison with controls after elimination the effects of endogenous factors such as hyperhydrosis by statistical tests. Similar to other investigations [3, 26], our results strongly support that hyperhydrosis can be considered as the endogenous factors in mediating the development of this infection.

In this survey, the most affected areas were the trunk and neck, which is concordant with the majority of studies worldwide [3, 21, 27]. The distribution of Malassezia species on back and chest is parallel with the density and activity of pilocebaceous glands in these areas. However, there are few reports indicated that PV lesions can occur in unusual location such as the nipple, genital areas and groin [2830]. Similar to previous studies [27], we found no statistical difference in the distribution of Malassezia species on various body sites.

Diagnosis of PV is generally simple and lies on the clinical manifestations and microscopic examinations of the lesions [13, 23]. In the direct examination 98% of PV samples yielded positive results which is the same as the results reported by Erchiga et al [31]. Two patients with negative results in this study had also been received topical antimycotic treatment.

In 89.4% of positive cases of PV, classical feature so-called "spaghetti and meatball" were seen. Our results are consistent with those previously published and confirm the significance of the yeast-mycelium conversion in pathogenesis of this infection [23, 31]. Regarding high sensitivity and acceptable specificity of direct exam, diagnosis of PV is based on observation of short hyphae and yeast in the scales. However, in cases that only hyphae were presented in the scales, direct examination of samples with KOH especially by unskillful technicians, may fail to reveal the infection. Hence, we suggest staining the scales prior to performing light microscopic examination to avoid false-negative results.

Culture is necessary to distinguish the Malassezia species by morphological and physiological methods. In the present study, the recovery rate of Malassezia species from the PV lesions was 87%, which was most comparable to recent study by Nakabayashi et al [19]. But, our result is higher than some previous studies [27, 3234]. The difference may be due to this fact that margin of the PV lesions might be used to collect specimens. However as it shown by Erchiga et al [23], unlike other dermatomycosis, center of the PV lesions yields more viable materials for culture. Hence we scraped center of the lesions instead of the borders to increase recovery rate and avoid isolation of surrounding commensal species. Besides, more recovery rate which was reported by Gupta et al [21] may reflect the difference in culture media and sampling method. Although Leeming & Notman agar which used by them enhances recovery of Malassezia spp., modified Dixon agar provides features of colonies [1, 33].

Based on many studies, more than one species can be recovered from each sample [21]. On the other hand, providing a pure culture and discriminating a species from mixed sample is too difficult. This might be due to this point that fast growing species usually cover other species in the culture. Besides, because of hydrophobic characteristic of Malassezia yeast, preparing homogenous suspension is very difficult to separate them by culture [1]. Moreover, some Malassezia species may loss their viability after several subcultures [7]. That's why we selected single separated colony in each species for analyzing.

As we mentioned above, Malassezia species are members of the normal skin flora and can be recovered from different sites of the body especially the sebaceous-rich areas. In healthy skin, we found Malassezia species by direct examination and culture with the frequency of 62% and 60%, respectively. These rates of positive results in our study are lower than those from recent study of Gupta et al [21] and may suggest the difference in sampling method and culture medium. Similar to the majority of other investigations [19, 34, 35], we found M. globosa as the most frequent species in healthy skin. By contrast, M. sympodialis was the main isolated species in some other investigations [17, 22, 36, 37].

In this survey, the most common isolated species in PV lesions was M. globosa, which is concordant with the majority of studies worldwide [19, 31, 32, 38]. This was contrary to observation of Makimura et al, which isolated M. furfur and M. sympodialis as the predominant species in PV lesions [37]. Although Gupta et al, were also found M. sympodialis as the predominant agent of PV in temperate climate, they reported M. globosa as the main agent in tropical regions [27]. Moreover, M. furfur was the second most frequent species isolated from PV lesions in the present study which was similar to the report of Dutta [32]. However they failed to isolate M. slooffiae from PV lesions.

Conclusions

Collectively, M. globosa was also the most prevalent species in healthy individuals and recovered from healthy skin only in yeast form. Furthermore, our results suggested that M. globosa especially in the mycelial form, is the main agent of PV and M. furfur is the second agent in importance. This hypothesis gained strength because of the fact that M. globosa is a species with high levels of esterase and lipase enzymes with probable importance in pathogenicity [38]. It remains an open question, if there are any differences in enzyme components of its mycelial phase with yeast form.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Hosein Mirhendi for his generous donation of Malassezia reference species.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Mycology & Parasitology, School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Immunology, School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Department of Bio-statistics, School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(4)
Department of Dermatology, Razi University Hospital

References

  1. Midgley G, Gueho E, Guillot J: Disease caused by Malassezia species. In Topley and Wilson's Microbiology and microbial infections 9 Edition (Edited by: Ajello L, Hay RJ). London: Arnold 1998, 4: 201–211.Google Scholar
  2. Leeming JP, Notman FH, Holland KT: The distribution and ecology of Malassezia furfur and cutaneous bacteria on human skin. J Appl Bacteriol 1989,67(1):47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gupta AK, Bluhm R, Summerbell R: Pityriasis versicolor. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2002,16(1):19–33. 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2002.00378.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitzpatrick TB, Johnson RA, Wolff K, Suurmond D: Color Atlas & Synopsis of Clinical Dermatology 4 Edition New York: Mc Graw Hill 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Eichstedt E: Pilzbildung in der Pityriasis versicolor. Frorip Neue Notizen aus dem Gebeite der Naturkunde Heilkinde 1846, 39: 270.Google Scholar
  6. Ingham E, Cunningham AC: Malassezia furfur . Med Mycol 1993, 31: 265–288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gueho E, G Midgley, Guillot J: The genus Malassezia with description of four new species. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1996, 69: 337–355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sugita T, Takashima M, Shinoda T, Suto H, Unno T, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H, Nishikawa A: New yeast species, Malassezia dermatis , isolated from patients with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol 2002,40(4):1363–7. 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1363-1367.2002View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirai A, Kano R, Makimura K, Duarte ER, Hamdan JS, Lachance MA, Yamaguchi H, Hasegawa A: Malassezia nana sp. Nov., a novel lipid-dependent yeast species isolated from animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004, 54: 623–7. 10.1099/ijs.0.02776-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guillot J, Gueho E, Lesourd M, Midgley G, Chevrier G, Dupont B: Identification of Malassezia species . A practical approach. J Mycol Med 1996, 6: 103–110.Google Scholar
  11. Mayser P, Haze P, Papavassilis C, Pickel M, Gruender K, Gueho E: Differentiation of Malassezia species: selectivity of Cremophor EL, castor oil and ricinoleic acid for M. furfur . Br J Dermatol 1997, 137: 208–213. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.18071890.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Borelli D, Jacobs PH, Nall L: Tinea versicolor: epidemiologic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991, 25: 300–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sunenshine PJ, Schwartz RA, Janniger CK: Tinea versicolor. Int J Dermatol 1998,37(9):648–55. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00441.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jalali AMH: Study the prevalence of superficial fungal diseases, Rasht, Iran [in Persian]. J Faculty Medicine Guilan Univ Med Sci. 1991,10(4):245–252.Google Scholar
  15. Moghaddami M: Tinea versicolor [in Persian]. J Faculty Medicine Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 1988, 3–4: 102–107.Google Scholar
  16. Burke RC: Tinea versicolor: susceptibility factors and experimental infections in human beings. J Investig Dermatol 1961, 36: 389–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crespo Erchiga V, Ojeda Martos A, Vera Casaño A, Crespo Erchiga A, Sanchez Fajardo F, Guého E: Mycology of pityriasis versicolor. J Mycol Med 1999, 9: 143–148.Google Scholar
  18. Belec L, Testa J, Bouree P: Pityriasis versicolor in the Central African Republic: a randomized study of 144 cases. J Med Vet Mycol 1991, 29: 323–329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakabayashi A, Sei Y, Guillot J: Identification of Malassezia species isolated from patients with seborrhoeic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, pityriasis versicolor and normal subjects. Med Mycol 2000, 38: 337–341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nikpoor N, Leppard B: Fungal disease in shiraz. Pahlavi Med J 1978, 901: 27–49.Google Scholar
  21. Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Summerbell RC, Faergemann J: Quantitative culture of Malassezia species from different body sites of individuals with or without dermatoses. Med Mycol 2001,39(3):243–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Crespo Erchiga V, Ojeda Martos A, Vera Casano A: Isolation and identification of Malassezia spp. In pytiriasis versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis and healthy skin. Rev Iberoam Micol 1999, 16: S16-S21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Crespo Erchiga V, Delgado Florencio V: Malassezia species in skin diseases. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2002,15(2):133–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Boardman CR, Malkinson FD: Tinea versicolor in steroid-treated patients. Incidence in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and regional enteritis treated with corticotropin and corticosteroids. Arch Dermatol 1962, 85: 44–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Faergemann J: Epidemiology and ecology of pityriasis versicolor. Curr Top Med Mycol 1989, 3: 153–167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ashbee HR, Evans EG: Immunology of diseases associated with Malassezia species. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002,15(1):21–57. 10.1128/CMR.15.1.21-57.2002View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Faergemann J, Summerbell RC: Epidemiology of Malassezia yeasts associated with pityriasis versicolor in Ontario, Canada. Med Mycol 2001,39(2):199–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Burkhart CG, Dvorak N, Stockard H: An unusual case of tinea versicolor in an immunosuppressed patient. Cutis 1981, 27: 56–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Anthony JL, Schosser RH, Gross DJ: Unilateral areolar and periareolar tinea versicolor. Int J Dermatol 1991, 30: 600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudolph RI, Holzwanger JM: Inverse tinea versicolor. Arch Dermatol 1975, 111: 1213. 10.1001/archderm.111.9.1213cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Crespo Erchiga V, Ojeda Martos A, Vera Casaño A, Crespo Erchiga A, Sanchez Fajardo F: Malassezia globosa as the causative agent of pityriasis versicolor. Br J Dermatol 2000, 143: 799–803. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03779.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dutta S, Bajaj AK, Basu S, Dikshit A: Pityriasis versicolor: socioeconomic and clinico-mycologic study in India. Int J Dermatol 2002,41(11):823–4. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01645.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Midgley G: The lipophilic yeasts: state of the art and prospects. Med Mycol 2000,38(Suppl 1):9–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sugita T, Suto H, Unno T, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H, Shinoda T, Nishikawa A: Molecular analysis of Malassezia microflora on the skin of atopic dermatitis patients and healthy subjects. J Clin Microbiol 2001,39(10):3486–90. 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3486-3490.2001View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Aspiroz C, Moreno LA, Rezusta A, Rubio C: Differentiation of three biotypes of Malassezia species on normal human skin. Correspondence with M. globosa , M. sympodialis and M. restricta . Mycopathologia 1999, 145: 69–74. 10.1023/A:1007017917230View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Arzumanian VG: The yeast Malassezia on the skin of healthy individuals and patients with atopic dermatitis. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 2001, (2):29–31.
  37. Makimura K, Tamura Y, Kudo M, Uchida K, Saito H, Yamaguchi H: Species identification and strain typing of Malassezia species stock strains and clinical isolates based on the DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions. J Med Microbiol 2000, 49: 29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Aspiroz C, Ara M, Varea M, Rezusta A, Rubio C: Isolation of Malassezia globosa and M. sympodialis from patients with pityriasis versicolor in Spain. Mycopathologia 2002,154(3):111–7. 10.1023/A:1016020209891View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-5945/4/5/prepub

Copyright

© Tarazooie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement