An unusual presentation of anetoderma: a case report
© Aghaei et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 09 April 2004
Accepted: 19 August 2004
Published: 19 August 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Apr 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Apr 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip LeBoit|
|20 Apr 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thilo Gambichler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thilo Gambichler|
|20 Jun 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Shahin Aghaei|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jun 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jun 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Shahin Aghaei|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|24 Jun 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Jun 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thilo Gambichler|
|27 Jul 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Shahin Aghaei|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|27 Jul 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|19 Aug 2004||Editorially accepted|
|19 Aug 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-5945-4-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.