Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Factors accounting for the association between anxiety and depression, and eczema: the Hordaland health study (HUSK)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
24 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Parker Magin
10 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Taylor
20 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Marianne Klokk
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Parker Magin
6 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Taylor
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Marianne Klokk
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Marianne Klokk
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Marianne Klokk
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
22 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-5945-10-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement