Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 29 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - KEJAL SHAH |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - W. Clark Lambert, M.D.,Ph.D. |
| 14 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claes Enk |
| 23 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erna Snellman |
| 24 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesca Mascia |
| 6 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - KEJAL SHAH |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 30 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesca Mascia |
| 2 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claes Enk |
| 2 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erna Snellman |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-10-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.