Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kazuhiko Takehara |
4 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Leask |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
8 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Efstathios Vassiliadis |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Leask |
23 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Efstathios Vassiliadis |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
3 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Efstathios Vassiliadis |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Efstathios Vassiliadis |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
21 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Efstathios Vassiliadis |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
21 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
29 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-11-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.