Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Naugler |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J Andrew Carlson |
24 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Piot |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Naugler |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christopher Naugler |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
29 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J Andrew Carlson |
30 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Piot |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
9 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-12-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.