Peer Review reports
From: Erythroderma: A clinical study of 97 cases
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Virendra N Sehgal |
| 22 Dec 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rashmi Sarkar |
| 19 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Grazia Bernengo |
| 16 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - siavash toosi |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - siavash toosi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Grazia Bernengo |
| 7 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rashmi Sarkar |
| 16 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - siavash toosi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - siavash toosi |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 May 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 May 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-5-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.