Peer Review reports
From: Mohs math – where the error hides
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 22 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlos Garcia |
| 24 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ellis |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlos Garcia |
| 22 Nov 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ellis |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 22 Nov 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 5 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ellis |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 5 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 6 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeffrey Ellis |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 6 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Dec 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Dec 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-6-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.