Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Jun 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charles Heard |
16 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Docherty |
13 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Docherty |
22 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charles Heard |
9 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Docherty |
24 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
31 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
31 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Hasler-Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
31 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
2 Apr 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Apr 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-5945-9-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.