Computer-aided dermoscopy for diagnosis of melanoma
© Barzegari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 22 February 2005
Accepted: 06 July 2005
Published: 06 July 2005
Computer-aided dermoscopy using artificial neural networks has been reported to be an accurate tool for the evaluation of pigmented skin lesions. We set out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a computer-aided dermoscopy system for diagnosis of melanoma in Iranian patients.
We studied 122 pigmented skin lesions which were referred for diagnostic evaluation or cosmetic reasons. Each lesion was examined by two clinicians with naked eyes and all of their clinical diagnostic considerations were recorded. The lesions were analyzed using a microDERM® dermoscopy unit. The output value of the software for each lesion was a score between 0 and 10. All of the lesions were excised and examined histologically.
Histopathological examination revealed melanoma in six lesions. Considering only the most likely clinical diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination for diagnosis of melanoma were 83% and 96%, respectively. Considering all clinical diagnostic considerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 89%. Choosing a cut-off point of 7.88 for dermoscopy score, the sensitivity and specificity of the score for diagnosis of melanoma were 83% and 96%, respectively. Setting the cut-off point at 7.34, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 90%.
The diagnostic accuracy of the dermoscopy system was at the level of clinical examination by dermatologists with naked eyes. This system may represent a useful tool for screening of melanoma, particularly at centers not experienced in the field of pigmented skin lesions.
The incidence of melanoma is much lower in Asia than in western countries . Clinicians sometimes misdiagnose early melanoma especially in areas with lower incidence of disease . Because advanced cutaneous melanoma is still incurable, early detection by means of accurate screening is an important step towards a reduction in mortality.
To our knowledge, the accuracy of such system for diagnosis of PSL has not been demonstrated in the Middle East, where most of the patients have Fitzpatrick skin type III-IV. We set out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this system in Iranian patients.
One hundred and twenty two consecutive PSLs equal or smaller than 15 mm in diameter, with a clinical diagnosis of one of the pigmented melanocytic lesions, which were referred to dermatology clinic of Razi Hospital for diagnostic evaluation or cosmetic reasons were included in the study. Each lesion was examined by two clinicians (an attending dermatologist and a third year dermatology resident) with naked eyes. They consulted with each other and recorded all of their clinical diagnostic considerations in a list. The first diagnostic consideration in the list was the most likely clinical diagnosis. After clinical examination, the lesions were analyzed using a microDERM® dermoscopy unit. The system consists of a special camera, which had ability to take images at ×15, ×20, ×30, and ×50 magnifications and contains a 752 × 582 pixel charge-coupled device. The image analysis software was Visiomed AG (Ver. 3.50) based on an ANN that was trained using images collected in a Europe-wide multicenter study (DANAOS) . The output value of the software is a score ranging from 0 to 10 for each lesion. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. All of the lesions were excised and examined histologically. The final diagnosis was made based on pathological examination.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Razi Hospital.
One hundred and twenty two pigmented skin lesions from 91 Iranian patients (30 male, 61 female; mean age 32.3 years, age range 6–94) were included in the study.
Melanoma was in the list of clinical diagnostic considerations in 19 lesions. It was the most likely clinical diagnosis in nine lesions.
Frequency and dermoscopy score of the lesions according to histopathological diagnosis.
No. of lesions
Lentigo maligna melanoma
Acral lentiginous melanoma
Considering only the most likely clinical diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination for diagnosis of melanoma were 83% and 96%, respectively. Considering all clinical diagnostic considerations, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 89%.
Cohen's kappa values for evaluation of agreement between diagnostic tests.
PD versus CD1
PD versus CD2
PD versus DS1
PD versus DS2
CD1 versus DS1
CD2 versus DS2
Dermoscopy is a noninvasive method that enables clinicians to evaluate numerous morphological features that are not visible to the naked eye. Several studies have shown that this method improves diagnostic accuracy by 20–30% compared with simple clinical observation [9–11]. Recently, computer-aided dermoscopy has been introduced as an additional tool to improve the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. In previous reports, the sensitivity of digital dermoscopy analysis for diagnosis of melanoma has ranged between 80% and 100% [12, 13]. The specificity has ranged between 46% and 98% [14, 15]. The diagnostic accuracy of most of the reported softwares have been at the level of a dermatologist experienced in dermoscopy and higher than inexperienced clinicians [3–5, 16]. In one study carried out by Seidenari et al, diagnostic accuracy of the software was higher than clinical assessment by an experienced observer . They reported that the sensitivity and specificity of computer analysis for diagnosis of melanoma were 93% and 95%, respectively. In that study, clinical assessments were performed on 20-fold magnified images. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis made by an experienced observer were 81% and 95%. When an untrained dermatologist assessed the images, sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis were 74% and 75%. Another study carried out by Bauer et al revealed that diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided dermoscopy was higher than dermoscopy by a trained dermatologist .
Visiomed AG, our image analysis software, has been trained using images collected from European countries. However, it could detect melanoma in Iranian patients with a high level of accuracy. The accuracy of the computerized dermoscopy system in our study is comparable with that of the most accurate reported systems [5, 6, 16].
Comparing clinical examination with dermoscopy score for diagnosis of melanoma in our study, there is no considerable difference in sensitivity and specificity. However, a larger study with higher power may detect a possible difference.
This system could not help us to reduce unnecessary excisions or improve early melanoma detection. Nevertheless, it may improve the diagnostic accuracy of an inexperienced clinician in the clinical evaluation of PSLs and represent a useful tool for screening of melanoma, particularly at centers not experienced in the field of PSLs. However, the cost benefit ratio of using this system needs to be assessed in developing countries with a low incidence of melanoma. Furthermore, it is of paramount importance to clarify that computer analysis has been developed in order to assist and not to replace physicians in the diagnosis of PSLs.
- Diepgen TL, Mahler V: The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2002, 146: 1–6. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.146.s61.2.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cassileth BR, Clark WH Jr, Lusk EJ, Frederick BE, Thompson CJ, Walsh WP: How well do physicians recognize melanoma and other problem lesions? J Am Acad Dermatol 1986, 14: 555–560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binder M, Steiner A, Schwarz M, Knollmayer S, Wolff K, Pehamberger H: Application of an artificial neural network in epiluminescence microscopy pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions: a pilot study. Br J Dermatol 1994, 130: 460–465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piccolo D, Ferrari A, Peris K, Diadone R, Ruggeri B, Chimenti S: Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study. Br J Dermatol 2002, 147: 481–486. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04978.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blum A, Luedtke H, Ellwanger U, Schwabe R, Rassner G, Garbe C: Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions. Br J Dermatol 2004, 151: 1029–1038. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06210.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann K, Gambichler T, Rick A, Kreutz M, Anschuetz M, Grunendick T, Orlikov A, Gehlen S, Perotti R, Andreassi L, Newton Bishop J, Cesarini JP, Fischer T, Frosch PJ, Lindskov R, Mackie R, Nashan D, Sommer A, Neumann M, Ortonne JP, Bahadoran P, Penas PF, Zoras U, Altmeyer P: Diagnostic and neural analysis of skin cancer (DANAOS). A multicentre study for collection and computer-aided analysis of data from pigmented skin lesions using digital dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 2003, 149: 801–809. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05547.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- NIH Consensus conference: Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. JAMA 1992, 268: 1314–1319. 10.1001/jama.268.10.1314View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnhill RL: Current status of the dysplastic melanocytic nevus. J Cutan Pathol 1991, 18: 147–159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steiner A, Pehamberger H, Wolff K: In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. II. Diagnosis of small pigmented skin lesions and early detection of malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987, 17: 584–591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T, Cognetta AB, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Bilek P, Braun-Falco O, Plewig G: The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994, 30: 551–559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P: Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol 2001, 137: 1343–1350.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ercal F, Chawla A, Stoecker WV, Lee HC, Moss RH: Neural network diagnosis of malignant melanoma from color images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994, 41: 837–845. 10.1109/10.312091View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Giannetti A: Digital videomicroscopy and image analysis with automatic classification for detection of thin melanomas. Melanoma Res 1999, 9: 163–171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farina B, Bartoli C, Bono A, Colombo A, Lualdi M, Tragni G, Marchesini R: Multispectral imaging approach in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: potentiality and limits. Phys Med Biol 2000, 45: 1243–1254. 10.1088/0031-9155/45/5/312View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer P, Cristofolini P, Boi S, Burroni M, Dell'Eva G, Micciolo R, Cristofolini M: Digital epiluminescence microscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions. A statistical comparison between visual and computer inspection. Melanoma Res 2000, 10: 345–349. 10.1097/00008390-200008000-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosado B, Menzies S, Harbauer A, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M, Kittler H: Accuracy of computer diagnosis of melanoma: a quantitative meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 2003, 139: 361–367. 10.1001/archderm.139.3.361View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Pepe P: Digital videomicroscopy improves diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998, 39: 175–181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-5945/5/8/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.